• Joaquim Tenreiro

    Inventing a modern tropical living
  • Opening Note
    Opening Note
    Joaquim Tenreiro once said, “My sensibility comes from the place where I live. It is here that I gain sensibility”. That belief — that creation must emerge from the realities of its place — lies at the heart of this exhibition. Other foundational voices in Brazilian art shared this conviction: Tarsila do Amaral reimagined modernism through the lens of the tropics; Amadeo Lorenzato’s textured surfaces evoke the country’s sidewalks, hills, labor, and silence. “Furniture for my time and in response to the reality of Brazil,” as Tenreiro defined his practice, is more than a phrase — it is a stance, a refusal to disconnect form from context. It is a recognition that each object carries not only a function or a silhouette, but a story shaped by its territory, materials, and culture. When I founded Bossa, what I longed for was precisely this: a place where objects could be read not only as beautiful, but as intelligent. As clues. As echoes of the systems and contradictions that shaped them. I wanted to highlight the layered histories that inform their ethos: the migration routes, domestic rituals, worshops, and patrons who made them possible. Tenreiro opened a gallery at one of Ipanema’s most prestigious addresses at a time when Brazil’s art scene was still nascent, even before the founding of the Museum of Modern Art in Rio de Janeiro or MASP in São Paulo. Newspaper articles from the late 1940s describe the space primarily as an art gallery, one of the few in Rio dedicated to showcasing modern works. What set it apart was its program and its vision: paintings, furniture, and everyday objects coexisted to propose a new model for modern tropical living. This exhibition brings together furniture pieces that have been carefully researched, restored in our workshop, and placed in dialogue with one another. This is not to illustrate a thesis but to suggest one: that Brazilian design deserves the same critical attention we give to the country’s architecture, literature, and painting. That an armchair can be as revealing as a canvas. That sensibility has always been political—and local.
  • My sensibility comes from the place where I live. It is here that I gain sensibility.

    — Joaquim Tenreiro. From an interview in Joaquim Tenreiro: Wood, Art and Design (1985).
  • The Life and Work of Joaquim Tenreiro

    Mina Warchavchik Hugerth

    Joaquim Albuquerque Tenreiro was born in 1906 in the small village of Melo, Portugal, which at the time had 1500 inhabitants. His father and grandfather were woodworkers, and some accounts note that as many as five generations before him worked with wood, undoubtedly informing his future command of the material. By age eight, the young apprentice began training as a craftsman, giving him preliminary insight into designing from a technical and practical standpoint.

    During Tenreiro’s childhood and teenage years, the family moved back and forth between Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Portugal, and by 1928, he relocated permanently to Rio. At that time, the city was the country’s capital, with over one million inhabitants and an exciting cultural scene. Tenreiro started working at a small furniture shop while studying drawing and painting at the Liceu Literário Português and later the Liceu de Artes e Ofícios, which led him to join the modernist collective Núcleo Bernardelli. Tenreiro was mostly immersed in a conservative environment and knew how to navigate it, but his yearning to move beyond historicist constraints soon became apparent.

    In 1933, Tenreiro started working for the high-end furniture firm Laubisch & Hirth as an assistant to the French designer Maurice Noisière, who had graduated from the École Boulle in Paris. Laubisch & Hirth was one of the biggest firms of its kind in Rio, with 350 craftsmen making custom designs. There, Tenreiro was introduced to various revival styles and contemporary lines akin to Art Deco, familiarized himself with Brazilian woods, and participated in the development of bespoke designs for entire houses. In 1936, he transferred to the furniture and upholstery firm Leandro Martins to work as head of the design department, and between 1941 and 1942, he worked for the furniture firm Francisco Gomes. By 1942, Tenreiro returned to Laubisch & Hirth in the position of his former supervisor and started designing modern pieces, but the company initially declined to put them into production.

    At that time, the writer Francisco Inácio Peixoto, who had just had his house designed by the modernist powerhouse-in-the-making Oscar Niemeyer the previous year, went to Laubisch & Hirth looking for furniture for his new home. Niemeyer’s design incorporated elements of traditional colonial architecture with international modernist precepts. Tenreiro was assigned the project somewhat by chance, and the custom pieces he created were more modern and lighter than anything Laubisch & Hirth had previously made (albeit arguably derivative of Scandinavian design), while using traditional materials and manufacturing techniques.

    Following that experience, Tenreiro decided to venture out and open his own studio and workshop with José Langenbach, a former salesman from Laubisch & Hirth. Beginning in 1943, Langenbach & Tenreiro offered modern and “English style” (likely Sheraton) designs. As Tenreiro recalled, his partner demanded that traditional furniture be presented, and so they compromised on producing a style that was not overly ornamented.

    Tenreiro had become fully immersed in modernist circles by the decade’s end and began furnishing homes designed by Niemeyer, Lúcio Costa, Sérgio Bernardes, Francisco Bolonha, and others. This put him in direct dialogue with these architects and solidified his commitment to creating interiors that responded to contemporary needs while respecting the culture and climate of their making. Langenbach & Tenreiro’s first store opened in 1947, still carrying both traditional and modern furniture, but, as legend goes, within a month, all contemporary pieces were sold and none of the period-style ones did, so from that point onwards, the store only displayed modern furniture.

    While the dichotomy between old and new fits well within the modernist narrative, however, there is more to how Tenreiro approached design, even if he didn’t openly address it. In the August 1955 issue of the modern architecture magazine Módulo, Tenreiro published an article about interior design aptly titled “Sobriety, Distinction, and Warmth,” as an opposition to extravagance, affluence, and opulence. In it, he initially discusses how the preceding two centuries had been defined by poor taste, to which modernism provided a break and a solution. He also praises the materials and techniques of Native Brazilians and traditional communities from the Northeast as much as he commends Charles Eames and Isamu Noguchi, but, ultimately, he states that modern Brazilian design and interiors should lie somewhere in the middle and yet be entirely new.

    Indeed, Tenreiro’s use of compositional elements like trellises and materials like cane and straw, not to mention wood, clearly reference popular furniture and architecture. His control of form echoes that of his modern counterparts in the United States and Europe. But what is missing from this equation and differentiates Tenreiro from most international players, as well as other designers emerging in Brazil at the time, is precisely his deep understanding of design history, in addition to and beyond both modernist and vernacular practices. Many of Tenreiro’s seats’ backrests allude to the slender spindles of Windsor chairs; he openly discusses his reinterpretations of Dom João V of Portugal–style chairs; some of his commissioned works dialogue with Renaissance pieces, with their intricate wood paneling. Tying all these disparate influences together was Tenreiro’s profound technical knowledge of how materials behaved and how far he could push them.

    In 1953, the company opened a shop in São Paulo, and that same year, Tenreiro ended his partnership with Langenbach to found Tenreiro Móveis e Decorações. In the following years, stores in both Rio and São Paulo moved and expanded, but the brick-and-mortar presence was not Tenreiro’s primary source of business; it was a business card. Private commissions to design complete interiors for the cultured elites in Brazil’s larger cities were Tenreiro’s principal occupation.

    During the 1950s and ’60s, Tenreiro took on numerous projects to furnish complete interiors. While most of the furniture employed was designed by him and produced in his workshop, documents show that he also selected pieces by Forma (which at the time was the licensed reseller of Knoll designs) and ordered rugs and other soft furnishings from specialized companies. To complete the environments, Tenreiro designed interior architecture elements, including doors, room dividers, ceiling fixtures, and other components that significantly impacted the spaces. As such, Tenreiro moved beyond being a designer of objects to become a designer of interiors. The transition in his practice was such that in 1957, Tenreiro briefly acted as the interior design editor of A Cigarra magazine and soon became a recognizable fixture in the media to discuss interiors and design. At the end of the 1960s, Tenreiro also taught classes on the subject at the Museum of Modern Art of Rio de Janeiro.

    Despite his success, Tenreiro’s writings and interviews at that time suggest a growing resentment toward the managerial aspect of his business. He often commented on being exhausted from having to travel and maintain stores in two states, in addition to overseeing the workshop. There is no indication that Tenreiro ever hired assistant designers as his enterprise grew, or that he had an easy time delegating tasks, making for a grueling schedule.

    Certainly, fueling the fire of his burnout was a cultural landscape that was drastically different at the end of the 1960s from what it had been in the early 1940s. Over almost three decades, Brazil had industrialized considerably, and several designers and companies expanded the market and desirability for modern design, mainly proposing a much more informal and relaxed sociability, even if under the dark cloud of a military dictatorship. Tenreiro likely felt left out of the field as it professionalized and expanded, and he voiced his discontent several times. When the first industrial design biennial of Rio de Janeiro opened in 1968, Tenreiro expressed his annoyance in the mainstream newspaper Jornal do Brasil for having been left out and for his work having been considered craft, not (industrial) design, even if that was also how he saw his work.

    By 1968, Tenreiro decided to leave his company. The official explanation was that he wanted to focus solely on his career as an artist, and indeed, he had wanted to be an artist before he ever became a designer and had never abandoned the practice. Parallel to the furniture and interiors business, Tenreiro had exhibited and won awards for his paintings and sculptures. His art ranged from figurative to abstract, and from painting to sculpture, eventually landing on what he called sculpaintings. In these wooden pieces, Tenreiro returned to his roots, working with his hands once again.


    In the following years, he made a few more commissioned designs, but slowly faded from the spotlight, except for a major career retrospective at the Museu de Arte de São Paulo in 1978, and another in 1985 at the art gallery of Centro Empresarial Rio, which was accompanied by a publication. In the book, Madeira, Arte, Design, Tenreiro reflects on his life and work and states that his driving force from the inception of his company was to design furniture for his time and in response to the reality of Brazil. That is, his goal was to make Brazilian furniture modern by making it elegant, simple, and respectful of craft traditions. There are complicated contradictions between modernism and the handmade, but Tenreiro doesn’t seem to dwell on that; he believed industrialization was necessary to supply products for the masses, but that it would never produce the finest level of craftsmanship. His take is closer to the sentiment of the nineteenth-century Arts & Crafts than the 1920s avant-garde utopianism.

    However conflicted Tenreiro’s place in the design history canon was during his time, today his influence is undeniable. So many who came after him—Branco & Preto, Móveis Artesanal, Sergio Rodrigues, Jorge Zalszupin, Carlos Motta, Claudia Moreira Salles, to name a few—worked by inheriting his sensibilities, proportions, and choice of materials. And while these designers achieved distinctive and remarkable designs in their own right, the genealogy can invariably be traced to Tenreiro and his amalgamation of design history into a cohesive regional output. It seems this understanding didn’t find him in his lifetime. After living his final years in relative obscurity, Tenreiro died in 1992.
  • Furniture for my time and in response to the reality of Brazil.

    — Joaquim Tenreiro, in interview to Módulo – Revista Brasileira de Arquitetura, no. 87, 1985.
  • Joaquim Tenreiro:, Inventing a Modern Tropical Living

    Joaquim Tenreiro:

    Inventing a Modern Tropical Living

    A prolific and gifted designer, Joaquim Tenreiro (1906–1992) masterfully laid the groundwork for modern living in Brazil through his furniture and interiors. Born in Portugal and trained as a woodworker, Tenreiro moved to Rio de Janeiro in the late 1920s and opened his own studio and workshop in the early 1940s. Tenreiro quickly began making work that was simultaneously of its time and timeless, introducing contemporary pieces that both understood the past and embraced the future. In the following decades, he excelled in utilizing Brazilian woods to their technical and aesthetic limits, playing with upholstery and caning for lighter and more ergonomic compositions, and reimagining how to complete architectural programs through furniture and art. Tenreiro truly understood his environment and his craft, giving the definitive tropical answer to the question of what living in a modern way should be. 

    Due to his artisanal approach, Tenreiro’s output was relatively limited, primarily reaching a select cultural elite. It was not until the late 1980s that his work began to be rediscovered in Brazil, and even more recently has it garnered international attention. As a result, much of Tenreiro’s vision is yet to be fully understood. Bossa is proud to present Joaquim Tenreiro: Inventing a Modern Tropical Living, the most comprehensive presentation of his work to date, offering new insights into his design philosophy, creative process, and cultural impact. We are deeply grateful to the collectors and scholars who have contributed to this showcase, which reveals the full breadth and diversity of Tenreiro’s practice and inaugurates a new chapter for him within the global narrative of design history.
  • Poltrona Leve (1942) Poltrona Leve (1942)
    Poltrona Leve (1942)
    The Light Armchair marked the first design Tenreiro fully claimed as his own—an early expression of his modern vision. For him, lightness wasn’t about weight but about elegance, proportion, and how a piece lived within a room. Tenreiro’s deep knowledge of woodworking allowed him to explore joinery, scale, and the natural rhythm of wood grain, creating a piece that is not only aesthetically pleasing, but also a seamless amalgamation of its compositional and structural elements.
  • Cadeira de Três Pés (1947)
    Cadeira de Três Pés (1947)
    A striking example of craftsmanship, this chair reflects Tenreiro’s distinctive and sensitive approach to form and materiality. Produced in versions combining two to five types of wood, the design cleverly bonds contrasting timbers to introduce flexibility and visual rhythm to rigid materials. The interplay of textures and tones results in a sculptural composition that feels both refined and modern. The chair was notably displayed at the 1961 Modern Art Salon in Rio de Janeiro.
  • Cadeira Estrutural (1943–47) Cadeira Estrutural (1943–47)
    Cadeira Estrutural (1943–47)
    Tenreiro named the Structural Chair as such to emphasize its radical transparency—every joint, line, and component is fully exposed. Comfort is achieved through sharp, deliberate angles, while the form is reduced to what is structurally essential. The matching Structural Table has a glass top, revealing its own architectural logic. In 1967, a special brass edition of the chair was created for the banquet hall of Itamaraty Palace (Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs) in the newly inaugurated Brasília.
  • As for the material, I insisted that it be very solid. But visually, the chair was very light. Because the essence of the furniture, you know what it is: it’s perfect joints. The handcraft is the joints. When the joints are perfect, nothing breaks it; it — Joaquim Tenreiro
  • This chair has remained in the Fraga family for over 64 years. Originally acquired by Dr. Hélio Fraga directly from... This chair has remained in the Fraga family for over 64 years. Originally acquired by Dr. Hélio Fraga directly from... This chair has remained in the Fraga family for over 64 years. Originally acquired by Dr. Hélio Fraga directly from...
    This chair has remained in the Fraga family for over 64 years. Originally acquired by Dr. Hélio Fraga directly from renowned designer Joaquim Tenreiro through architect Carlos Leão, the piece was purchased for the family residence Leão designed in Gávea. After several years of use, it was carefully preserved in storage in Petrópolis until 1999, when Hélio’s widow gifted it to their nephew, Mario Fraga.
  • When I was making furniture, cane weaving had all but disappeared — no one was using it anymore. I brought it back from the colonial tradition. Cane weaving originally came from India and eventually became a Brazilian tradition. For many years, Brazil mad — Joaquim Tenreiro. From an interview in Joaquim Tenreiro: Wood, Art and Design (1985),
  • Between Colonial and Rural, Tenreiro Discovers Minas Gerais

    Between Colonial and Rural

    Tenreiro Discovers Minas Gerais
    Founded in 1947, Langenbach & Tenreiro Ltda. emerged from Joaquim Tenreiro’s determination to create something new— after years of designing for prominent furniture firms such as Laubisch & Hirth, Leandro Martins, and Francisco Gomes. Without the means to industrialize, Tenreiro embraced artisanal production as a path toward modern furniture — pieces made one by one, with care and intention. He envisioned a future grounded in modern, handcrafted design. His partner, meanwhile, looked to the past, favoring English-style furniture rooted in tradition. They reached a compromise: half the showroom would display modern furniture, the other half, traditional. The day after the opening, Tenreiro boarded a train to São João del Rei, a colonial town in the heart of Minas Gerais, known for its baroque churches, stone streets, and deeply rooted craft traditions. He disappeared for twenty days. When he returned, every modern piece had sold. Not a single traditional one had. From that moment on, he never produced another piece of “style” furniture. The debate was settled. That turning point reverberates in the photograph beside it, where a table by Tenreiro shares the frame with two paintings by Amadeo Lorenzato. Both artists begin from a similar gesture: the reinterpretation of the Brazilian landscape through a language entirely their own. Lorenzato translated the textures, colors, and topographies of Minas Gerais into painting; Tenreiro channeled artisanal knowledge and Brazil’s material memory into furniture defined by distilled, quiet form. Each, in their own way, rejected imported models and shaped a modernity grounded in local roots—rigorous, sensitive, and unmistakably Brazilian.
  • The Galeries

    Spaces of Modern Living

    When Joaquim Tenreiro opened his first location in 1947, on Rua Barata Ribeiro in Copacabana—a neighborhood in Rio de Janeiro—it immediately stood apart from other furniture retailers of the time. Contemporary newspaper articles often referred to it as Galeria Tenreiro, not as a store, but as a space dedicated to culture and art—one of the few in the city actively presenting modern art. In addition to exhibiting his own work, Tenreiro hosted exhibitions by Bruno Giorgi, Burle Marx, Ivan Serpa, Alfredo Volpi, and others. The showroom functioned not merely as a commercial venue, but as a cultural platform—a role acknowledged in the press of the period. Photographs reveal the evolution of the space. In earlier images, the sign reads Langenbach & Tenreiro Ltda, seen from the inside. In another photograph, taken in 1953, the same address appears from the outside, now under the name Tenreiro Móveis e Decorações—marking the moment when Tenreiro ended his partnership with José Langenbach and established his independent firm. Rather than displaying furniture as disconnected objects, Tenreiro created fully composed domestic environments. Pieces were arranged in carefully staged vignettes that evoked the intimacy and functionality of real homes. These settings did more than showcase design—they proposed a way of living. With clarity of form, balance of proportion, and an intuitive grasp of space, Tenreiro transformed humble materials into refined expressions of Brazilian modernity.

    In 1953, Tenreiro opened a second showroom in São Paulo, on Rua Marquês de Itu, near Praça da República, one of the city’s most prestigious addresses at the time. The following year, to accommodate growing demand, he relocated his workshop to a larger facility on Rua 7 de Março, in Bonsucesso, where up to 100 craftsmen were employed. In 1956, the São Paulo showroom moved to Conjunto Nacional, a newly inaugurated modernist landmark designed by David Libeskind, and began operating under the name Tenreiro Móveis e Decorações Ltda. Although the stores in both cities gained visibility and prestige, Tenreiro’s primary focus remained on private commissions. His showrooms were never just retail outlets—they were an extension of his philosophy: spaces where his vision was made tangible, inviting clients to inhabit a new ideal of Brazilian modern living.

  • Manta Solta, 1955
    Manta Solta, 1955

    Radical in concept and precise in execution, the Manta Solta set embodies Joaquim Tenreiro’s disruptive vision for modern furniture design in mid-twentieth-century Brazil. Crafted in 1955, these pieces completely abandon traditional upholstery norms by eliminating internal structural components. As a result, Tenreiro makes every part of the design visible—nothing is concealed, everything is on display. Visually, the pieces seem deceptively soft and fluid, as if the upholstered volumes have been casually draped or folded—hence the name Manta Solta, which means “loose mantles”. Their forms consist of leather hides sewn over foam, relying solely on the strength of their geometry for support. This design gives them a sculptural quality: low to the ground and wide, with generous, organically shaped arms and backs that flow seamlessly from the seat.

    The design’s innovation lies in its structural transparency. By omitting wooden frames or internal reinforcements, the furniture depends on high-density foam for shape and stability. Stitching serves as a key compositional element—functional and visually striking—defining the contours, securing the volumes, and enhancing the crafted precision. Far from a departure, the Manta Solta set builds upon the constructive logic of Tenreiro’s Estrutural family. It reflects the same commitment to structural clarity—the kind he perfected in his iconic rounded wooden elements, turned by hand, without screws or nails, and assembled with his signature flawless joinery. This set is a rare example of Joaquim Tenreiro at his most experimental, stripping furniture to its essence without sacrificing elegance or function. Manta Solta stands as both an aesthetic statement and a philosophical one: a rejection of excess and a celebration of the visible labor, form, and intelligence embedded in every surface.

  • Chaise, c. 1954 Chaise, c. 1954
    Chaise, c. 1954
    Originally commissioned for a family home in Ipanema, this chaise exemplifies the radical spirit of early Brazilian modernism. The piece emerged from Tenreiro’s close collaboration with Carlos Gondin—founder of Gemaco, a construction company responsible for numerous notable buildings across Rio’s South Zone, often in partnership with architect Álvaro Vital Brazil. Tenreiro frequently furnished Gemaco’s model apartments, and this particular commission for Gondin’s house in Ipanema reflects the trust, intimacy, and creative alignment that arose between designer and client. Structurally, the chaise is defined by its organic silhouette and material clarity—a fluid composition of wood, upholstery, and cane. A continuous expanse of newly-reupholstered blue mohair by Rogers and Goffigon traces the reclining form, anchored by sculptural rosewood legs and framed by cane panels at the headrest and footrest. The splayed legs and sharply angled body introduce a sense of motion, while the overall profile remains serene and inviting. As with much of Tenreiro’s finest work, the construction perfectly balances structural rigor and visual lightness. A unique piece, this chaise has only one known counterpart: a similar model created by Tenreiro in 1954 for Oscar Niemeyer’s Edmundo Cavanelas house—a landmark of Brazilian modernism with gardens by Roberto Burle Marx. Acquired directly from Gondin’s grandson in 2008, the piece remains today a rare expression of Tenreiro’s architectural sensibility: sculptural yet restrained, technically exacting yet effortlessly elegant, and deeply attuned to the modern Brazilian way of living
  • When I read a book about the Bauhaus, I felt one of the greatest joys of my life. Walter Gropius explained the teaching method, the development of the student within the school. It was exactly the path I had taken. What a coincidence! I was working in a w — Joaquim Tenreiro. From an interview in Joaquim Tenreiro: Wood, Art and Design (1985).
  • Material Practices

    Material Practices

    Tenreiro’s preferred woods were jacarandá (rosewood) and pau marfim (ivory wood), but he also worked with roxinho (purple heart), imbuia (Brazilian walnut), amendoim, vinhático, and cabreúva (Santos mahogany). All these species are known for their strength and stability, but also for being difficult woods to manipulate, requiring differentiated approaches in the workshop. Tenreiro included other materials in his pieces wherever they would perform better than wood, such as underpainted glass for tabletops, fabric and leather for upholstery, and laminate for utilitarian fixtures. Occasionally, he also collaborated with other artists and incorporated their works into his, such as upholstery fabric designed by Fayga Ostrower and handpainted ceramic tiles by Regina Bolonha.
  • Joaquim Tenreiro, le décorateur à la brésilienne

    Joaquim Tenreiro

    le décorateur à la brésilienne
    Most Brazilian cities in the 1950s and ’60s were undergoing intense modernization and verticalization, with apartment living rapidly becoming the new domestic standard. These new architectural typologies demanded a shift in interior design: spaces needed to be more flexible, more integrated, and furnished with pieces capable of organizing and dividing rooms in response to evolving spatial constraints. Tenreiro responded with clarity and inventiveness. His furniture was not only designed to fit these interiors physically, but also to express a more modern way of living — refined, discreet, and attuned to climate, proportion, and use. In France, the postwar figure of the décorateur — epitomized by names like Jean Royère and Jacques Adnet — stood for a refined sensibility that extended beyond furniture design to the orchestration of entire environments: cohesive spaces where taste, proportion, and comfort converged. These decorators worked holistically, designing or selecting everything from rugs and furnishings to art, lighting, and personal objects. In Brazil, that role found its most compelling expression in Joaquim Tenreiro — le décorateur à la brésilienne. Recognized not only as a designer but also as a decorator with an exceptional sense of taste, Tenreiro was widely regarded for producing some of the finest modern furniture in Rio. His work stood out for its formal elegance, but also for its comfort — an achievement not always guaranteed in modernist design.
  • Clients often commissioned him to conceive entire environments — living rooms, dining rooms, bedrooms, and beyond — furnishing a home... Clients often commissioned him to conceive entire environments — living rooms, dining rooms, bedrooms, and beyond — furnishing a home...
    Clients often commissioned him to conceive entire environments — living rooms, dining rooms, bedrooms, and beyond — furnishing a home in a single, unified gesture. This approach, rooted in the classical training he received in the 1930s, emphasized durability, coherence, and spatial harmony. Much of the Tenreiro furniture that survives today comes from these comprehensive commissions, carefully preserved in estates that reflect the full depth of his vision. These interiors were more than elegant—they were deeply layered. Tenreiro’s modernist designs coexisted with important artworks by Tarsila do Amaral, Di Cavalcanti, and Modigliani. They shared space with modern lamps, handcrafted ceramics, bronze sculptures, and personal objects like Afro-Brazilian jewelry arranged atop coffee tables. His interiors conveyed not only aesthetic clarity but also cultural depth—spaces where Brazilian modernism emerged not as an isolated style, but as a way of inhabiting the world. At a time when few galleries in Rio were dedicated to contemporary design and art, Tenreiro’s own showroom set a new standard. It was among the only spaces in the city to consistently present high-quality modern art through thoughtfully curated exhibitions.